Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 23:25:11 GMT -5
The Court highlights that “the accused is a nurse, and aware of the three substances referred to, as well as that they are totally inadvisable for minors of such a young age, giving her doses that would not endanger her physical integrity, much less her vitality.” . For this reason, it has convicted the accused as the author of a crime against public health , in the form of substances that cause serious damage to health, as well as a crime of abuse in the family environment. In addition to the prison sentence, she has disqualified her from exercising parental authority for two years and has imposed the deprivation of the right to own and carry weapons for two and a half years.
The Chamber concludes that there was a violation of the protected legal good, that is, public health, since it highlights that the drug "was administered to a baby, by her mother, who was Fax Lists the one who had her care and custody." However, it indicates that " the exposure of the minor to such drugs did not cause harm to her physical integrity ", which is why it includes the conduct of the accused within the criminal category of mistreatment of her daughter. . The magistrates highlight the “ premeditated attitude ” of the convicted woman, who denounced “the sleepy state that her daughter presented when she returned from visits with her father.
The sentence is not final, since an appeal can be filed against it before the TSXG.The SEPE must prove that an unemployment recipient was abroad for more than 15 days to withdraw aid The Supreme Court considers that the burden of proof falls on the public body (Photo: E&J) The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the State Public Employment Service (SEPE) against the ruling that annulled the termination resolution of unemployment benefits received by a person who was no longer entitled to this aid because he traveled abroad for a period. longer than 15 days without having communicated or requested authorization from the organization.
The Chamber concludes that there was a violation of the protected legal good, that is, public health, since it highlights that the drug "was administered to a baby, by her mother, who was Fax Lists the one who had her care and custody." However, it indicates that " the exposure of the minor to such drugs did not cause harm to her physical integrity ", which is why it includes the conduct of the accused within the criminal category of mistreatment of her daughter. . The magistrates highlight the “ premeditated attitude ” of the convicted woman, who denounced “the sleepy state that her daughter presented when she returned from visits with her father.
The sentence is not final, since an appeal can be filed against it before the TSXG.The SEPE must prove that an unemployment recipient was abroad for more than 15 days to withdraw aid The Supreme Court considers that the burden of proof falls on the public body (Photo: E&J) The Supreme Court has dismissed the appeal filed by the State Public Employment Service (SEPE) against the ruling that annulled the termination resolution of unemployment benefits received by a person who was no longer entitled to this aid because he traveled abroad for a period. longer than 15 days without having communicated or requested authorization from the organization.